z-logo
Premium
PHOSPHATE‐SULFIDE ASSEMBLAGES AND Al/Ca RATIOS IN TYPE‐3 CHONDRITES
Author(s) -
Rubin Alan E.,
Grossman Jeffrey N.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
meteoritics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1945-5100
pISSN - 0026-1114
DOI - 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1985.tb00044.x
Subject(s) - troilite , chondrite , geology , allende meteorite , meteorite , pyroxene , chondrule , geochemistry , mineralogy , chemistry , astrobiology , olivine , physics
Phosphate‐sulfide assemblages are common constituents in type‐3 carbonaceous and ordinary chondrites. CV3 chondrites contain assemblages of pentlandite‐merrillite and troilite‐merrillite as well as isolated grains of Ca‐pyroxene; CO3 chondrites contain troilite‐merrillite (± schreibersite) as well as isolated grains of plagioclase; and, H‐L‐LL3 chondrites contain troilite‐merrillite (± metal), troilite‐chlorapatite, and metal‐chlorapatite. The phosphate‐bearing assemblages probably formed in the following manner: (1) metal grains with significant P formed in the nebula at high temperatures; (2) Schreibersite exsolved and crystallized at metal grain boundaries during cooling; (3) some metal grains were sulfurized at lower temperatures by H 2 S; (4) the metal‐schreibersite and sulfide‐schreibersite assemblages accreted rims of finegrained silicates; and, (5) the Schreibersite reacted with Ca, O and Cl from these silicates to form merrillite and chlorapatite. The reported bulk compositions of chondritic constituents have ***CI‐normalized Al/Ca ratios >1, whereas whole‐rock ratios are unfractionated. Even though the phosphate‐bearing assemblages and isolated grains of Ca‐bearing silicates are ubiquitous in type‐3 chondrites, they are insufficiently abundant to lower the Al/Ca ratios of the major chondritic components to those of the whole‐rocks. It seems probable that some of the analytical data are incorrect; bulk compositions determined by microprobe may yield erroneously high Al/Ca ratios if samples are analyzed with a broader electron beam than used for analyzing the standards. We recommend analyzing standards and samples with the same size beam.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here