Premium
Evaluation of a Suicide Prevention Center by Sampling the Population at Risk*
Author(s) -
Motto Jerome A.
Publication year - 1971
Publication title -
suicide and life‐threatening behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.544
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1943-278X
pISSN - 0363-0234
DOI - 10.1111/j.1943-278x.1971.tb00596.x
Subject(s) - crisis intervention , center (category theory) , suicide prevention , intervention (counseling) , population , mental health , trauma center , psychiatry , medicine , psychology , poison control , medical emergency , environmental health , retrospective cohort study , chemistry , crystallography
At present there are no clear guidelines for assessing the effectiveness of suicide prevention and crisis centers. This report focuses on one readily available source of data, specifically that segment of the population at risk made up of persons admitted to the inpatient service of a mental health center due to depressive and/or suicidal states, including suicide attempts. To determine the role of the suicide prevention center in providing services to this group, 575 persons meeting these criteria were interviewed. The findings included the following: (a) 11 percent had utilized suicide prevention center services, with 59 percent of these experiencing substantial benefit; (b) 20 percent stated they were unaware of the center; (c) 8 percent expressed the view that calling the center would be inappropriate because a suicide attempt was not imminent; and (d) 26 percent indicated an inclination to call the center in the event of subsequent difficulties. Experience suggests that response to a crisis (intervention) as well as response to low lethality callers with “everyday problems” (prevention) constitute valid functions of a suicide prevention and crisis center. Preoccupation with short‐term goals, such as reducing the apparent suicide rate, should not dominate the conceptualizing of program evaluation methods.