Premium
Is Small Beautiful? Multiparty Politics and Democratic Consolidation in Timor‐Leste
Author(s) -
Shoesmith Dennis
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
asian politics and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.193
H-Index - 12
eISSN - 1943-0787
pISSN - 1943-0779
DOI - 10.1111/j.1943-0787.2011.01318.x
Subject(s) - polity , democratic consolidation , politics , democracy , timor leste , political science , political economy , consolidation (business) , independence (probability theory) , corporate governance , negotiation , multi party system , authoritarianism , transparency (behavior) , democratization , public administration , democratic governance , development economics , sociology , law , economics , statistics , mathematics , accounting , finance
Drawing on comparisons of the experience of multiparty politics in postcolonial African states and in Papua New Guinea, this article considers whether the party and electoral systems in Timor‐Leste retard a transition to a consolidated democratic polity. Like FRELIMO in Mozambique, the independence party, FRETILIN, committed to a one‐party regime until both parties adopted multiparty politics from the late 1980s. Since independence, Timor‐Leste has been relatively successful in establishing a competitive party system. This article argues, however, that the proliferation of small parties and the necessity to negotiate unstable coalition governments retard the process of democratic consolidation in Timor‐Leste, and the party system undermines effective state governance and restricts rather than broadens democratic representation. A weak multiparty system has encouraged corruption and poor governance in Papua New Guinea, and multiparty politics threaten similar outcomes in Timor‐Leste.