Premium
South Korea's Missile Defense Policy: Dilemma and Opportunity for a Medium State
Author(s) -
Kim TaeHyung
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
asian politics and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.193
H-Index - 12
eISSN - 1943-0787
pISSN - 1943-0779
DOI - 10.1111/j.1943-0787.2009.01131.x
Subject(s) - missile defense , dilemma , missile , alliance , china , political science , ballistic missile , state (computer science) , politics , security dilemma , strategic defense initiative , computer security , international trade , political economy , business , engineering , law , economics , computer science , aerospace engineering , philosophy , epistemology , algorithm
Proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) delivery systems has made missile defense a key security challenge, but missile defense systems are highly controversial. I closely examine the development of the missile defense system in South Korea. South Korea has steadfastly remained outside the theater missile defense (TMD) structure, but it cooperates on missile defense, in a limited way, with its U.S. ally. South Korea's refusal to participate in TMD even as it quietly acquires air defense systems can be explained by political and diplomatic considerations regarding its neighbors (especially China), military and economic considerations about missile defense, and strategic considerations for the United States‐South Korea alliance. The TMD situation demonstrates South Korea's dilemma and opportunity as a medium power in a particularly harsh security environment. South Korea is walking a fine line to diversify security relations, to maintain the alliance structure with the United States (albeit in a changed form), and to build a self‐reliant military capability.