Premium
Race, Ethnicity, and U.S. House Incumbent Evaluations
Author(s) -
Branton Regina P.,
Cassese Erin C.,
Jones Bradford S.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
legislative studies quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.728
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1939-9162
pISSN - 0362-9805
DOI - 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2012.00058.x
Subject(s) - ethnic group , race (biology) , preference , representation (politics) , social psychology , recall , test (biology) , psychology , political science , demographic economics , sociology , gender studies , economics , law , politics , cognitive psychology , microeconomics , paleontology , biology
This article considers evaluations of U . S . House incumbents under conditions of racial/ethnic congruence and incongruence. We consider whether different racial groups have ordered preferences among nondescriptive alternatives. We pose two theoretical models of descriptive representation and test them using pooled N ational E lection S tudy data. After controlling for the propensity to recall the Member of Congress, we find the extent of favoritism towards descriptive representatives varies across groups, as does the preference ordering among representatives of different racial and ethnic identification. No evidence of race‐based judgment is uncovered among African Americans, while Latinos and Whites demonstrate preferences based on race and ethnicity.