Open AccessTIMBER SUPPLY UNDER DEMAND UNCERTAINTY: WELFARE GAINS FROM PERFECT COMPETITION WITH RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS
Author(s) -
GONG PEICHEN,
LÖFGREN KARLGUSTAF
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
natural resource modeling
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.28
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1939-7445
pISSN - 0890-8575
DOI - 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2003.tb00103.x
Subject(s) - monopoly , supply , economics , supply and demand , microeconomics , competition (biology) , demand curve , function (biology) , perfect competition , duopoly , welfare , econometrics , industrial organization , cournot competition , market economy , ecology , evolutionary biology , biology
. This paper presents a noneconometric approach to estimating the short‐run timber supply function based on optimal harvest decisions. Determination of optimal harvest levels and estimation of supply function coefficients are integrated into one step by incorporating a parametric short‐run timber supply function into the harvest decision model. In this manner we convert the original harvest decision model into a new optimization problem with the supply function coefficients functioning as “decision variables.” Optimal solution to the new decision model gives the coefficients of the short‐run supply function and, indirectly, the optimal harvest levels. This approach enables us to develop stochastic models of the timber market that are particularly useful for forest sector analysis involving comparison of alternative institutional regimes or policy proposals and when the timber market is affected by stochastic variables. For demonstration purposes, we apply this method to compare the performances of two timber market regimes (perfect competition and monopoly) under demand uncertainty, using the Swedish data. The results show that the expected timber price is 22 percent lower and the expected annual timber supply is 43 percent higher in the competitive market than in the monopoly market. This confirms the theoretical result that monopoly reduces supply and increases price. The expected social welfare gain from perfect competition over monopoly is about 24 percent.