Open AccessSystematic Review of Efficacy of Nutraceuticals to Alleviate Clinical Signs of Osteoarthritis
Author(s) -
Vandeweerd J.M.,
Cois C.,
Clegg P.,
Cambier C.,
Pierson A.,
Hontoir F.,
Saegerman C.,
Gustin P.,
Buczinski S.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of veterinary internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.356
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1939-1676
pISSN - 0891-6640
DOI - 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00901.x
Subject(s) - medicine , nutraceutical , clinical trial , systematic review , medline , alternative medicine , consolidated standards of reporting trials , osteoarthritis , randomized controlled trial , evidence based medicine , physical therapy , intensive care medicine , pathology , political science , law
Background Various treatments of osteoarthritis ( OA ) have been described, including use of nutraceuticals. Objectives To review systematically the literature about the effects of nutraceuticals on clinical signs of pain or abnormal locomotion in horses, dogs, and cats, and to discuss methodological aspects of trials and systematic reviews. Methods A systematic search of controlled trials evaluating the impact of nutraceuticals on OA in horses, dogs, and cats was performed, using Medline, CAB Abstracts, and Google Scholar. Scientific evidence was evaluated by means of criteria proposed by the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ), and a scoring system adapted from both the CON solidated Standards of Reporting Trials ( CONSORT ) statement and recommendations for assessing trials by the Center of Evidence Based Medicine of Oxford. Results Twenty‐two papers were selected and reviewed, with 5 studies performed in horses, 16 in dogs, and 1 in cats. The strength of evidence was low for all nutraceuticals except for omega‐3 fatty acid in dogs. There were limited numbers of rigorous randomized controlled trials and of participants in clinical trials. Conclusions and Clinical Importance The evidence of efficacy of nutraceuticals is poor, with the exception of diets supplemented with omega‐3 fatty acids in dogs. Greater access to systematic reviews must be part of the objectives of the veterinary science in the future. Their reporting would be improved by internationally agreed‐upon criteria for standards and guidelines.