Open AccessTissue Doppler Imaging and Gradient Echo Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Normal Cats and Cats with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Author(s) -
MacDonald Kristin A.,
Kittleson Mark D.,
GarciaNolen Tanya,
Larson Richard F.,
Wisner Erik R.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of veterinary internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.356
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1939-1676
pISSN - 0891-6640
DOI - 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2006.tb02907.x
Subject(s) - medicine , hypertrophic cardiomyopathy , cats , magnetic resonance imaging , doppler imaging , doppler effect , echo (communications protocol) , gradient echo , cardiology , radiology , nuclear magnetic resonance , diastole , blood pressure , computer network , physics , astronomy , computer science
Cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) often develop diastolic dysfunction, which can lead to development of left congestive heart failure. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) echocardiography has emerged as a useful, noninvasive method for assessing diastolic function in cats. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) has been performed in cats and accurately quantifies left ventricular (LV) mass in normal cats. However, assessment of cardiac function in cats by cMRI has not been performed. Six normal Domestic Shorthair cats and 7 Maine Coon cats with moderate to severe HCM were sedated, and TDI of the lateral mitral annulus was performed. Peak early diastolic velocity (Em) was measured from 5 nonconsecutive beats. Cats were anesthetized with propofol and electrocardiogram‐gated gradient echo cMRI was performed during apnea after hyperventilation. Short‐axis images of the LV extending from the mitral annulus to the apex were obtained throughout the cardiac cycle. LV mass at end systole and LV volumes throughout the cardiac cycle were quantified according to Simpson's rule. To assess the possible influence of propofol on diastolic function, TDI was performed on the 7 cats with HCM while sedated and then while anesthetized with propofol. Em was significantly lower in cats with HCM than normal cats (6.7±1.3 cm/s versus 11.6±1.9 cm/s, P <.001, respectively). There was no difference in the cMRI indices of diastolic function in normal and HCM cats. Propofol did not reduce diastolic function (Em) in cats with HCM but mildly reduced systolic myocardial velocity (S) in Maine Coon cats with HCM that were anesthetized with propofol ( P = .87 and P = .03, respectively).