z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy
Author(s) -
Armstrong P. Jane,
Hardie Elizabeth M.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
journal of veterinary internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.356
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1939-1676
pISSN - 0891-6640
DOI - 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1990.tb00898.x
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy , percutaneous , gastrostomy , general surgery , radiology , finance , peg ratio , economics
Results are presented of consecutive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEGs) performed in 32 feline and 22 canine patients over a 30‐month period. Indications for PEG placement were hepatic disease (33%), esophageal disease (32%), oronasal abnormalities (22%), and cranial nerve deficits (4%), with miscellaneous conditions accounting for 9%. The median duration that PEG tubes were in place was 18 days (range, 0–320 days). The suitability of this feeding technique for clinical use was assessed by evaluating mortality, procedure‐related and delayed complications, and body weight changes by the end of the PEG feeding period. Fifty‐two of 54 PEGs were placed and used successfully. One fatality occurred during tube insertion due to splenic laceration, and one dog died of aspiration pneumonia secondary to pharyngoesophageal dysfunction. Other than splenic laceration, procedure‐related complications were benign pneumoperitoneum (1/54) and minor gastric hemorrhage resulting in melena (1/54). Delayed complications occurring 24 hours or longer after the procedure included aspiration (4/54), peristomal infection or excessive granulation tissue (3/54), and tube extraction or migration (3/54). Nineteen of 54 animals showed evidence of inadequate gastric emptying or volume intolerance when food was introduced after PEG placement. This effect was minor and easily resolved. Of the 44 animals for which follow‐up body weight information was available, 19 gained weight, six remained static, and 19 lost weight during the PEG feeding period. Percutaneous gastrostomy is a relatively safe, effective procedure and should be given early consideration for medium‐ or long‐term enteral nutritional support in appropriate canine and feline patients. (Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 1990; 4:202–206)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here