Premium
A Conceptual Framework for Critical Review: The Aronoff Center for the Arts
Author(s) -
Heuberger Barbara Flannery,
Special Kenneth W.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of interior design
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.229
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 1939-1668
pISSN - 1071-7641
DOI - 10.1111/j.1939-1668.1997.tb00238.x
Subject(s) - interior design , conceptual framework , conceptual design , center (category theory) , management science , the arts , architectural engineering , space (punctuation) , research design , the conceptual framework , strengths and weaknesses , engineering , sociology , knowledge management , computer science , psychology , visual arts , mechanical engineering , social science , art , chemistry , crystallography , social psychology , performance art , art history , operating system
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project is to develop a conceptual framework for conducting critical reviews of interior environments and to apply that framework to the critique of Cincinnati's Aronoff Center for the Performing Arts designed by Cesar Pelli. RESEARCH DESIGN: Critical analysis was applied to the Aronoff Center as the methodology used in this study. ANALYSIS: A conceptual framework for critical review of interior spaces was developed based on “essential skills” in interior design as identified by the Foundation for Interior Design Education Research (FIDER). Five categories of design were included: (a) space planning; (b) design elements and principles; (c) finish materials, decorative elements, and detailing; (d) lighting; and (e) furniture. KEY FINDINGS: The critical review of the Aronoff Center identified a mixture of strengths and weaknesses in the 5 areas. Space planning, design elements, and furniture choices were generally strong. Lighting did not reflect current aesthetic and technological possibilities. The details and materials of the design solutions related to access by people with disabilities were of mixed success. CONCLUSIONS: Implications of using critical review methodology are discussed for interior design education, theoretical development, and the design process. Through critical review, interior design scholars, educators, and practitioners have an opportunity to apply their unique perspectives and expertise. This paper presents a conceptual framework that can be used in that opportunity.