z-logo
Premium
Best practices for evaluation of bone marrow in nonclinical toxicity studies
Author(s) -
Reagan William J.,
IrizarryRovira Armando,
PoitoutBelissent Florence,
Bolliger Anne Provencher,
Ramaiah Shashi K.,
Travlos Greg,
Walker Dana,
Bounous Denise,
Walter Gail
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
veterinary clinical pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.537
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1939-165X
pISSN - 0275-6382
DOI - 10.1111/j.1939-165x.2011.00323.x
Subject(s) - bone marrow , clonogenic assay , toxicant , bone marrow transplant , medicine , toxicity , pathology , bone marrow transplantation , biology , cell , genetics
This manuscript is intended to provide a best practice approach to accurately and consistently assess toxicant‐induced bone marrow effects of test articles. In nonclinical toxicity studies, complete blood count data in conjunction with the histological examination of the bone marrow are recommended as the foundation for assessing the effect of test articles on the hematopoietic system. This approach alone can be used successfully in many studies. However, in some situations it may be necessary to further characterize effects on the different hematopoietic lineages, either by cytological or flow cytometric evaluation of the bone marrow. Both modalities can be used successfully, and which one is selected will depend on the expertise, preference of the facility, and the nature of the change in the bone marrow. Other specialized techniques such as clonogenic assays or electron microscopy are used rarely to further characterize hematotoxicity. The indications and techniques to successfully employ histological, cytological, or flow cytometric evaluation as well as clonogenic assays and electron microscopy are reviewed. William J. Reagan, Armando Irizarry‐Rovira, Florence Poitout‐Belissent, Anne Provencher Bolliger, Shashi K. Ramaiah, Greg Travlos, Dana Walker, Denise Bounous, and Gail Walter. "Best Practices for Evaluation of Bone Marrow in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies." Toxicologic Pathology (39.2) pp. 435‐448, copyright 2011 by The Author(s), Reprinted by Permission of SAGE Publications Inc .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here