Premium
Multi‐Product Quality Competition: Impact of Resource Constraints
Author(s) -
YaylaKüllü H. Müge,
Parlaktürk Ali K.,
Swaminathan Jayashankar M.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
production and operations management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.279
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1937-5956
pISSN - 1059-1478
DOI - 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01379.x
Subject(s) - cannibalization , product proliferation , industrial organization , oligopoly , competition (biology) , product differentiation , quality (philosophy) , product (mathematics) , microeconomics , business , economics , market share , valuation (finance) , new product development , product market , unit (ring theory) , margin (machine learning) , marketing , product management , cournot competition , computer science , incentive , philosophy , biology , geometry , epistemology , machine learning , mathematics education , finance , mathematics , ecology
We study a multi‐product firm with limited capacity where the products are vertically (quality) differentiated and the customer base is heterogeneous in their valuation of quality. While the demand structure creates opportunities through proliferation, the firm should avoid cannibalization between its own products. Moreover, the oligopolistic market structure puts competitive pressure and limits the firm's market share. On the other hand, the firm has limited resources that cause a supply‐side fight for adequate and profitable production. We explicitly characterize the conditions where each force dominates. Our focus is on understanding how capacity constraints and competition affect a firm's product‐mix decisions. We find that considering capacity constraints could significantly change traditional insights (that ignore capacity) related to product‐line design and the role of competition therein. In particular, we show that when the resources are limited, the firm should offer only the product that has the highest margin per unit capacity. We find that this product could be the diametrically opposite product suggested by the existing literature. In addition, we show that for intermediate capacity levels, whereas the margin per unit capacity effect dominates in a less competitive market, proliferation and cannibalization effects dominate in a more competitive market.