z-logo
Premium
Coming to Terms with our Human Fallibility: Christensen on the Preface
Author(s) -
Kaplan Mark
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
philosophy and phenomenological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1933-1592
pISSN - 0031-8205
DOI - 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00563.x
Subject(s) - citation , lottery , publishing , philosophy , analytic philosophy , epistemology , classics , computer science , history , library science , contemporary philosophy , mathematics , art , literature , statistics
Imagine that I have just finished delivering a philosophy paper. The question period has just begun. You raise your hand. Once called upon, you tell me that something I said very early on in my presentation, taken together with two things I said somewhat late in the presentation, logically imply a contradiction. What might I say in response? I might say that I actually hadn’t said all these three things. Or, I might deny that the three things logically imply a contradiction. What I wouldn’t do—because it would be absolutely outrageous for me to do it—is admit that I said the three things, admit that they logically imply a contradiction, but deny that this was any criticism of what I said. Thus the following principle:

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom