z-logo
Premium
Justified Judging
Author(s) -
BIRD ALEXANDER
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
philosophy and phenomenological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1933-1592
pISSN - 0031-8205
DOI - 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00004.x
Subject(s) - judgement , antecedent (behavioral psychology) , epistemology , subject (documents) , philosophy , sort , philosophy of mind , analytic philosophy , psychology , contemporary philosophy , social psychology , computer science , metaphysics , information retrieval , library science
Traditional approaches to epistemology have sought, unsuccessfully, to define knowledge in terms of justification. I follow Timothy Williamson in arguing that this is misconceived and that we should take knowledge as our fundamental epistemological notion. We can then characterise justification as a certain sort of approximation to knowledge. A judgement is justified if and only if the reason (if there is one) for a failure to know is to be found outside the subject’s mental states; that is, justified judging is possible knowing (where one world accessible from another if and only if they are identical with regard to a subject’s antecedent mental states and judgement forming processes). This view is explained and defended.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here