Premium
Realism and Human Kinds
Author(s) -
THOMASSON AMIE L.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
philosophy and phenomenological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1933-1592
pISSN - 0031-8205
DOI - 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00309.x
Subject(s) - epistemology , ignorance , realism , natural (archaeology) , externalism , ontology , philosophy of mind , philosophy of science , natural kind , critical realism (philosophy of perception) , independence (probability theory) , privilege (computing) , philosophy , sociology , computer science , metaphysics , mathematics , statistics , archaeology , computer security , history , identity (music) , aesthetics
It is often noted that institutional objects and artifacts depend on human beliefs and intentions and so fail to meet the realist paradigm of mind‐independent objects. In this paper I draw out exactly in what ways the thesis of mind‐independence fails, and show that it has some surprising consequences. For the specific forms of mind‐dependence involved entail that we have certain forms of epistemic privilege with regard to our own institutional and artifactual kinds, protecting us from certain possibilities of ignorance and error; they also demonstrate that not all cases of reference to these kinds can proceed along a purely causal model. As a result, realist views in ontology, epistemology, and semantics that were developed with natural scientific kinds in mind cannot fully apply to the kinds of the social and human sciences. In closing I consider some wider consequences of these results for social science and philosophy.