z-logo
Premium
Faecal Sampling Underestimates the Actual Prevalence of Salmonella in Laying Hen Flocks
Author(s) -
Van Hoorebeke S.,
Van Immerseel F.,
De Vylder J.,
Ducatelle R.,
Haesebrouck F.,
Pasmans F.,
De Kruif A.,
Dewulf J.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
zoonoses and public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.87
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1863-2378
pISSN - 1863-1959
DOI - 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01211.x
Subject(s) - flock , salmonella , veterinary medicine , biology , sampling (signal processing) , feces , salmonella enteritidis , european union , medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , bacteria , genetics , filter (signal processing) , computer science , business , computer vision , economic policy
Summary In all European Union member states, Salmonella monitoring in poultry flocks is obligatory. In these monitoring programmes, a limited number of pooled faeces and/or dust samples are collected to determine whether Salmonella is present in the flocks or not. Whether these limited sampling protocols are sufficiently sensitive to detect expected low within‐flock prevalences of an intermittently shed pathogen is not yet clear. In this study, a comparison is made between different sampling procedures for the assessment of the between‐ and within‐flock prevalence of Salmonella in laying hens. In total, 19 farms were sampled. Using a comparable sampling methodology as in the official surveillance programmes, Salmonella could not be detected in any of the flocks. After transportation of the hens to the laboratory and subsequent analysis of cloacal swabs and caecal contents, Salmonella Enteritidis was detected in laying hens from five of 19 farms. The observed within‐flock prevalence ranged from 1% to 14%. Based on the results of this study, it can be expected that, depending on the sampling procedure, different estimates of the prevalence of Salmonella can be obtained and the proportion of Salmonella infected flocks is underestimated based on the results of the official monitoring programme.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here