Premium
University Accounting Programs and Professional Accountancy Training: Can UK Pragmatism Inform the Australian Debate?
Author(s) -
King Ruth,
Davidson Ian
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
australian accounting review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.551
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 1835-2561
pISSN - 1035-6908
DOI - 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2009.00062.x
Subject(s) - optimal distinctiveness theory , accounting , accreditation , political science , politics , pragmatism , training (meteorology) , business , psychology , law , philosophy , physics , epistemology , meteorology , psychotherapist
Professional accountancy training and academic accounting programs in the United Kingdom (UK) have remained resolutely separate, despite attempts at partial integration through a system of accreditation and exemptions. This is in contrast with the situation in some other countries, notably the United States (US) and until recently Australia. This paper identifies some historical reasons for their having developed in this way and for their continuing distinctiveness. We conclude that the approach is both workable and adaptable, albeit idiosyncratic, with changes occurring over time that reflect the shifting sands of market and political pressures. With six recognised accounting bodies in the UK, this ability to respond to change is important and we surmise that it would take some fundamental shift in circumstance, such as a move towards European standardisation, for a different model to prevail in the UK.