Premium
Issues in the Drive to Measure Liabilities at Fair Value
Author(s) -
BRADBURY MICHAEL E.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
australian accounting review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.551
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 1835-2561
pISSN - 1035-6908
DOI - 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2000.tb00059.x
Subject(s) - liability , current liability , accounting , fair value , contingent liability , business , debt , actuarial science , value (mathematics) , financial instrument , mark to market accounting , financial accounting , finance , economics , accounting information system , computer science , machine learning , working capital
This paper compares the discussion on liability measurement in Accounting The0y Monograph 10 with the liability measurement requirements in recent international proposals on accounting for financial instruments. Rather than conducting a detailed review of the Monograph, the paper examines three major issues which wawant amplifjing, extending or criticising: What is “fair value”? Why fair value liabilities? Should fair value include an entity's own credit risk? The focus is on financial liabilities such as “plain vanilla” debt; other financial liabilities, such as insurance obligations, pensions, wawanties and environmental damage restoration involve additional considerations and are therefore not considered.