Premium
Placement and replacement of restorations by selected practitioners
Author(s) -
Tyas MJ
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
australian dental journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.701
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1834-7819
pISSN - 0045-0421
DOI - 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2005.tb00345.x
Subject(s) - amalgam (chemistry) , dentistry , glass ionomer cement , medicine , cement , dental practice , orthodontics , materials science , composite material , chemistry , electrode
Background: There are few Australian data on the reasons for placement and replacement of restorations, and the extent to which these are carried out in general practice. Methods: A survey was carried out of approximately 100 consecutive restorations placed by each of 28 general dental practitioners. The data were coded and statistically analyzed for various associations. Results: Resin composite was used twice as frequently as amalgam as a restorative material, and nearly four times as often as glass‐ionomer cement. Secondary caries was the principal reason for replacing restorations, affecting predominantly amalgam restorations in Class I and Class V cavities. Teeth restored with amalgam fractured nearly twice as often as teeth restored with resin composite. The average ages of amalgam, resin composite and glass‐ ionomers at replacement were 13.6, 7.1 and 5.7 years respectively. Conclusions: Amalgam has the longest clinical service life, but is associated with more tooth fracture. Secondary caries is the main reason for replacing restorations. The anti‐cariogenic effect of glass‐ionomer cement is equivocal.