Premium
Studies of dental root surface caries. 1: Comparison of natural and artificial root caries lesions
Author(s) -
McIntyre J. M.,
Featherstone J. D. B.,
Fu J.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
australian dental journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.701
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1834-7819
pISSN - 0045-0421
DOI - 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00238.x
Subject(s) - root caries , dentistry , root (linguistics) , medicine , philosophy , linguistics
Qualitative polarized light microscopy and cross‐sectional microhardness testing profiles were used to compare artificial root caries lesions with those naturally present in extracted human teeth. The artificial lesions were produced by immersion of roots with exposed windows in chemical buffers of acetate and lactate with no added enzymes or bacteria. The three buffer systems used produced lesions with the range of histological characteristics of natural lesions. These included a ‘body’ or ‘surface’ zone of the lesion when viewed in water, and a ‘frontal’ zone of reverse birefringence when viewed in quinoline. The ‘frontal’ zone was noted to first develop after three days of immersion in acetate buffer. Advanced natural lesions exhibited a wide, diffuse, advancing front, which was similar to that produced by 28–60 day lesions in acetate. Microhardness profiles of natural lesions could all be matched by one or more of the artificial lesions. The demineralizing process was seen to reduce mineral content across the lesion from 45 per cent in normal dentine to between 15 and 25 per cent.