z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Strength of the Evidence Generated From Reports of Clinical Research
Author(s) -
Vamvakas Eleftherios C.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1778-428X
pISSN - 1295-9022
DOI - 10.1111/j.1778-428x.2003.tb00167.x
Subject(s) - medicine , confounding , population , clinical psychology , environmental health
SUMMARy Positive or negative findings in clinical research may represent true‐positive or true‐negative results, which reflect a relationship that does or does not exist in the reference population of interest. Alternatively, positive or negative findings in clinical research may represent false‐positive or false‐negative results, which are due to chance, bias, and/or confounding factors. If such alternative explanations for the results of a study have been ruled out, a valid statistical association is reported. A judgment of a cause‐and‐effect relationship is based on the totality of all available evidence, and it can also be made from a large, double‐blind, and correctly conducted and analyzed randomized controlled trial.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here