Premium
Power and limits of laser scanning confocal microscopy
Author(s) -
Laurent Michel,
Johannin Georges,
Gilbert Nathalie,
Lucas Laurent,
Cassio Doris,
Petit Patrice X,
Fleury Anne
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
biology of the cell
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.543
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1768-322X
pISSN - 0248-4900
DOI - 10.1111/j.1768-322x.1994.tb00934.x
Subject(s) - confocal , optics , optical sectioning , microscopy , microscope , confocal microscopy , light sheet fluorescence microscopy , laser , materials science , flattening , optical microscope , focus (optics) , scanning confocal electron microscopy , computer science , physics , scanning electron microscope , composite material
In confocal microscopy, the object is illuminated and observed so as to rid the resulting image of the light from out‐of‐focus planes. Imaging may be performed in the reflective or in the fluorescence mode. Confocal microscopy allows accurate and nondestructive optical sectioning in a plane perpendicular or parallel to the optical axis of the microscope. Further digital three‐dimensional treatments of the data may be performed so as to visualize the specimen from a variety of angles. Several examples illustrating each of these possibilities are given. Three‐dimensional reconstitution of nuclear components using a cubic representation and a ray‐tracing based method are also given. Instrumental and experimental factors can introduce some bias into the acquisition of the 3‐D data set: self‐shadowing effects of thick specimens, spherical aberrations due to the sub‐optimum use of the objective lenses and photobleaching processes. This last phenomenon is the one that most heavily hampers the quantitative analysis needed for 3‐D reconstruction. We delineate each of these problems and indicate to what extent they can be solved. Some tips are given for the practice of confocal microscope and image recovery: how to determine empirically the thickness of the optical slices, how to deal with extreme contrasts in an image, how to prevent artificial flattening of the specimens. Finally, future prospects in the field are outlined. Particular mention of the use of pulsed lasers is made as they may be an alternative to UV‐lasers and a possible means to attenuate photodamage to biological specimens.