Premium
Cell determinants of vasopressin‐stimulated water flow
Author(s) -
Carvounis C. P.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
biology of the cell
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.543
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1768-322X
pISSN - 0248-4900
DOI - 10.1111/j.1768-322x.1985.tb00427.x
Subject(s) - tonicity , toad , biophysics , vasopressin , cytosol , biology , water flow , permeability (electromagnetism) , membrane , endocrinology , anatomy , medicine , biochemistry , environmental engineering , engineering , enzyme
I present a technique that permits evaluation of the permeability to water of the luminal membrane of the toad urinary bladder, independently of constraints to water flow imposed by the remainder of the tissue. This technique essentially depends on fixation of the luminal membrane with 1% glutaraldehyde for 5 min, and subsequent elimination of cytosolic constraints by decreasing the tonicity of the serosal bath to 1/2 normal strength. The increased hydraulic conductivity found with serosal hypotonicity is readily reversible, as the bladder returns to an isotonic serosal bath. By evaluating water flow in luminally fixed bladders during bathing in normal and hypotonic bath, one may identify the relative contribution of the luminal membrane and the “cytosol” on water flow. Using this technique, I found that the effect of the prostaglandin inhibitor Naproxen to increase vasopressin‐stimulated water flow is due to increased luminal membrane permeability. The effect of histidine to increase vasopressin‐stimulated water flow, however, depends on increased permeability of both the luminal membrane as well as the underlying structures. The action of serosal hypertonicity to induce water flow is due to an increased luminal permeability. However, serosal hypertonicity decreases “cytosolic” permeability, so that its overall function is a composite effect of its action at the luminal membrane and the “cytosolic” level.