z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) with tranbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) versus mediastinoscopy for mediastinal staging in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) thoracic cancer
Author(s) -
Nasir Basil,
Cerfolio Robert J.,
Bryant Ayesha S.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
thoracic cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.823
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1759-7714
pISSN - 1759-7706
DOI - 10.1111/j.1759-7714.2011.00106.x
Subject(s) - mediastinoscopy , medicine , lung cancer , radiology , endoscopic ultrasound , stage (stratigraphy) , mediastinum , radiation therapy , cancer , positron emission tomography , cancer staging , lymph , pathology , paleontology , biology
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide and is responsible for more cancer deaths than the next three most common cancers combined. Despite common use of the best non‐invasive tests for assessing clinical stage: computed tomography (CT) and integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using 2‐deoxy‐2‐18‐fluoro‐D‐glucose (FDG), the pathologic stage is often different. The status of mediastinal (N2) lymph nodes is paramount in guiding therapy towards surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or a combination of these modalities. Accurate staging is mandatory for patients prior to commencing therapy. Invasive tests that afford tissue biopsies of N2 lymph nodes are: esophageal ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS‐TBNA), and mediastinoscopy. This review article compares the two most commonly used invasive methods to obtain tissue biopsies of mediastinal (N2) lymph nodes: mediastinoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here