
Diagnostic utility of endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal lesions: A prospective three year, single centre analysis
Author(s) -
Mohan Anant,
Naik Samir,
Pandey Ravinder Mohan,
Mills Janet,
Munavvar Mohammed
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
thoracic cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.823
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1759-7714
pISSN - 1759-7706
DOI - 10.1111/j.1759-7714.2011.00063.x
Subject(s) - medicine , malignancy , radiology , endobronchial ultrasound , confidence interval , prospective cohort study , lymph node , logistic regression , lesion , bronchoscopy , surgery
Background: The diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) over a 3‐year period was analyzed. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EBUS for the evaluation of pulmonary/mediastinal lesions were recruited. Results: One hundred and ninety‐one patients were studied (54% male, mean age, 65 years [standard deviation 11.1]). A final diagnosis of a malignant disorder was made in 151 patients (79%). Of these, EBUS‐TBNA alone provided the diagnosis in 135 patients. The majority of the remaining 56 patients had reactive changes (n = 32). Nineteen patients, either because they did not respond to appropriate treatment or based on clinical indication, underwent a different procedure resulting in an additional diagnosis of malignancy in 16 patients, tuberculosis in one and indeterminate in two. The diagnostic yield of EBUS for malignant disorders was 70.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86, 0. 77). The overall ability of EBUS to achieve a definitive diagnosis (benign plus malignant) was 90.1% (95% CI, 0.85, 0. 94). Logistic regression and stepwise regression analysis revealed that older age, greater lymph node size, and the presence of intraprocedure complications significantly influenced EBUS yield for malignancy. Conclusion: EBUS‐TBNA has a high diagnostic yield for mediastinal lesions, both benign and malignant. The yield depends on both lesion‐ and patient‐related factors.