Premium
Institutional Innovations to Govern Environmental Water in the Western United States: Lessons for Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin
Author(s) -
Garrick Dustin,
LaneMiller Chelsea,
McCoy Amy L.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
economic papers: a journal of applied economics and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.245
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 1759-3441
pISSN - 0812-0439
DOI - 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2011.00104.x
Subject(s) - structural basin , corporate governance , socioeconomic status , accountability , environmental planning , water development , political science , geography , environmental resource management , regional science , water resources , business , environmental science , sociology , paleontology , population , demography , finance , law , biology , ecology
The commitment to recover water for the environment in the Murray–Darling Basin is unprecedented internationally. However, the use of water markets to reallocate water for the environment first occurred in the Western United States in the late 1980s as part of water reforms that remain ongoing. This paper explores lessons from institutional innovations in the Western United States, including design principles to coordinate environmental water management across jurisdictions and adapt to unintended consequences caused by socioeconomic and hydrologic interactions at multiple scales. Two decades of implementation experience in the Western United States suggest a middle path between top‐down and bottom‐up approaches: nested governance arrangements that invest in local institutional capacity while ensuring complementary state and federal roles for basin‐scale integration and accountability.