Premium
Bribery versus extortion: allowing the lesser of two evils
Author(s) -
Khalil Fahad,
Lawarrée Jacques,
Yun Sungho
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the rand journal of economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.687
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1756-2171
pISSN - 0741-6261
DOI - 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00095.x
Subject(s) - extortion , incentive , language change , business , computer security , law and economics , economics , political science , law , microeconomics , computer science , art , literature
Both bribery and extortion weaken the power of incentives, but there is a trade‐off in fighting the two because rewards to prevent supervisors from accepting bribes create incentives for extortion. Which is the worse evil? A fear of inducing extortion may make it optimal to tolerate bribery, but extortion is never allowed. Extortion discourages “good behavior” because the agent suffers from it even though he has done the right thing, whereas a bribe acts as a penalty for “bad behavior.” Our analysis provides lessons to fight corruption and explanations why developed countries may have an advantage in dealing with extortion.