Premium
Forensic Methods and Procedures Applied to Child Custody Evaluations: What Judges Need to Know in Determining a Competent Forensic Work Product
Author(s) -
GOULD JONATHAN W.,
BELL JUDGE LISA C.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
juvenile and family court journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.155
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 1755-6988
pISSN - 0161-7109
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-6988.2000.tb00023.x
Subject(s) - forensic science , mental health , psychology , child custody , craft , product (mathematics) , work (physics) , forensic psychology , scientific evidence , criminology , medicine , psychiatry , engineering , history , epistemology , mechanical engineering , philosophy , geometry , mathematics , archaeology , veterinary medicine
Judges are seeing an increase in the number of forensic reports in the area of child custody. This increase in forensic mental health involvement suggests that judges need to better understand the application of current forensic mental health methodology to assist them in determining a competent forensic work product. Recent literature has argued that child custody evaluators need to craft their reports consistent with scientific methods and procedures as well as legal standards governing admissibility of scientific evidence. This paper provides a framework for judges to assist in determining whether a child custody evaluation has been crafted consistent with current behavioral science literature pertaining to use of forensic mental health methods and procedures.