Premium
Punishment, Accountability, and the New Juvenile Justice
Author(s) -
Forst Martin L.,
Crim D.,
Blomquist MarthaElin
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
juvenile and family court journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.155
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 1755-6988
pISSN - 0161-7109
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-6988.1992.tb00714.x
Subject(s) - accountability , economic justice , punishment (psychology) , terminology , juvenile , meaning (existential) , demise , sociology , ideal (ethics) , criminology , political science , law , psychology , epistemology , social psychology , philosophy , biology , ecology , linguistics
The juvenile justice system has undergone radical change in the past three decades. The procedural revolution that began at the end of the 1960s with the Gault decision has more recently evolved into a substantive revolution. The changes in juvenile justice have been many and in some instances drastic, particularly in the apparent demise of the rehabilitative ideal. New theories or models have emerged, incorporating terminology such as punishment, justice, and accountability into the vocabulary of juvenile justice practitioners and the lexicon of state juvenile codes. The transformation in the philosophy and underlying goals of the system has been well‐documented over the past decade or so. It is now time to ask critical questions about the significance and meaning of this transformation and to bring attention to unresolved issues. This article suggests the issues that need to be addressed in order to make both practical and philosophical sense out of the changes in the mission of “juvenile justice.”