Premium
Who should manage continuous renal replacement in the intensive care setting? A nursing viewpoint
Author(s) -
Martin R. K.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
edtna‐erca journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.381
H-Index - 27
eISSN - 1755-6686
pISSN - 1019-083X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2002.tb00256.x
Subject(s) - nursing , renal replacement therapy , medicine , critical care nursing , nursing care , specialty , team nursing , intensive care , primary nursing , nursing management , intensive care medicine , nursing research , nurse education , health care , family medicine , economics , economic growth
Summary Since its inception, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been performed in critical care units with or without the involvement of nephrology nursing support (1,2). It is apparent that the issue of providing care to patients requiring this therapy is not so much a debate on the nursing control of CRRT, but a focused discussion on the nursing management and delivery of care to the patient receiving CRRT in the intensive care setting. Although the choice of a nursing care model for CRRT is dependent on many clinical and organisational factors, the use of one nursing specialty to deliver CRRT care can leave gaps in practice. The Joint or Collaborative Nephrology/critical care nursing model brings the highest level of nursing expertise to the bedside. The joint model tends to promote collaboration between two distinct nursing specialties, with opportunities for setting joint standards and promoting research. With this in mind, this discussion will examine some of the factors affecting structuring of nursing care, describe nursing models currently in use, compare the attributes of each, and conclude which model is preferred for the delivery of nursing care for CRRT.