Open AccessRegression of Cardiac Valvulopathy Related to Ergot‐Derived Dopamine Agonists
Author(s) -
Zanettini Renzo,
Antonini Angelo,
Gatto Gemma,
Gentile Rosa,
Tesei Silvana,
Pezzoli Gianni
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
cardiovascular therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.818
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1755-5922
pISSN - 1755-5914
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00169.x
Subject(s) - pergolide , medicine , cabergoline , cardiology , discontinuation , prolactinoma , carcinoid heart disease , heart disease , valvular heart disease , dopamine agonist , dopamine , surgery , dopaminergic , carcinoid syndrome , prolactin , hormone
SUMMARY Aims: In a previous echocardiographic prevalence study we reported a significant increase in the frequency of heart valve regurgitation in patients with Parkinson's disease taking the ergot‐derived dopamine agonists pergolide and cabergoline versus controls. We followed‐up our original cohort of patients to ascertain whether valvulopathy regressed after discontinuation of treatment and/or its incidence increased over time. Methods: Prospective follow‐up of 101 patients treated with ergot‐derived dopamine agonists included in the prevalence study: 53 given pergolide and 48 cabergoline (64% male; 66.4 ± 8.7 years of age, 11.5 ± 5.9 years of disease, 21.8 ± 5.9 months of follow‐up); 55 stopped treatment while 46 continued. The main outcomes measures, were: echocardiographic quantification of regurgitant valve disease, abnormal leaflet, or cusp thickening and measurement of mitral valve tenting area. Results: Valve abnormalities regressed in about one third of patients with significant multivalvular and in about half of the patients with monovalvular regurgitation who withdrew; no progression was observed in remaining patients. Patients continuing ergot‐derived dopamine agonists showed progression of cardiac valvulopathy: seven new cases with three to four regurgitation grade of any valve occurred during follow‐up; this regarded also patients who had been on pergolide for many years. Conclusion: Owing to the persistence of risk of heart valve damage over time and the lack of its mid‐term reversibility in many patients, we believe that pergolide and cabergoline should be prescribed only when therapeutic alternatives with a better risk/benefit ratio are unavailable and the patient has access to echocardiography.