z-logo
Premium
DALK or PKP? ‐ Surgical management of keratoconus
Author(s) -
Seitz Berthold
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2019.8168
Subject(s) - keratoconus , medicine , visual acuity , fibrous joint , astigmatism , excimer , ophthalmology , excimer laser , corneal topography , surgery , cornea , laser , optics , physics
Since 2010, more than 1300 patients have been registered in our Homburg Keratoconus Center HKC. Major objectives include (1) aetiology, (2) earliest diagnosis and (3) stage‐related treatment options. Excimer laser assisted DALK is a good option for skilled microsurgeons in case of good endothelium and lack of predescemetal scars offering visual acuity results of 20/25 or 20/20 when Descemet membrane is indeed exposed. In case of nonexposure of Descemet membran and/or in case of perforation conversion to excimer laser assisted PKP can be performed readily without disadvantages for the typically young patient. Central round 8.0 or 8.5 mm excimer laser assisted PKP with double‐diagonal cross‐stitch suture is still state‐of‐the‐art in advanced keratoconus – especially after corneal hydrops. Nonmechanical excimer laser trephination results in (1) lower astigmatism, (2) higher regularity of topography and (3) better visual acuity. In contrast, femtosecond laser assisted PKP demanding applanation and deformation of the cone during suction, results in decentration and noncongruent shapes of donor and host intraoperatively as well as very high astigmatism after entire suture removal – thus to be considered the „excitement of yesterday“.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here