z-logo
Premium
Validation of a predictive model for retinal vascular resistance and blood flow by means of Laser Speckle Flowgraphy
Author(s) -
Pappelis Konstantinos,
Choritz Lars,
Jansonius Nomdo
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2019.5461
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , ophthalmology , population , intraocular pressure , blood pressure , vascular resistance , central retinal artery , blood flow , environmental health
Purpose (1) To mathematically predict retinal vascular resistance and blood flow from minimal input; (2) to validate the model predictions in a healthy population using Laser Speckle Flowgraphy (LSF). Methods Fundus photographs, OCT and OCT‐angiography scans, and systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were performed in 32 healthy subjects. Predicted vascular resistance (PVR) was determined from the central retinal artery and vein equivalents, the fractal dimension of the vasculature, and population‐based hematocrit values, according to the Poiseuille law and an adapted version of the fractal model proposed by Takahashi et al. (2009). Predicted blood flow (PBF) was calculated as OPP/PVR, where OPP is the ocular perfusion pressure. For validation, the mean blur rate (MBR; measure of velocity) of large vessels inside the optic disc and waveform parameters (heart rate [HR], flow acceleration index [FAI], skew, acceleration time index, blowout score and time, fluctuation, rising rate, falling rate [FR]) were recorded by means of LSF. Linear models reduced by the Akaike Information Criterion were used to assess the relationship of PVR and PBF with the LSF parameters. Results In the reduced multivariable model, PVR was higher with higher DBP (p < 0.001), FAI (p < 0.001), and FR (p = 0.042), as well as with lower skew (p < 0.001), MBR (p = 0.001), and fluctuation (p = 0.103). PBF was higher with higher skew (p < 0.001) and MBR (p = 0.040), as well as with lower FAI (p < 0.001) and HR (p = 0.055). The R 2 of the models was 0.83 and 0.58, respectively. PVR correlated with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), but not with macular volume ( r  = −0.53, p = 0.002; r  = −0.218, p = 0.23). PBF correlated with macular volume, but not with RNFLT ( r  = 0.382, p = 0.031; r = 0.326, p = 0.068). Conclusions PVR can be used as a surrogate of vascular resistance. PBF provided a lesser fit with the LSF parameters and partially describes retinal blood flow. Reference Takahashi T, Nagaoka T, Yanagida H, et al. (2009). A mathematical model for the distribution of hemodynamic parameters in the human retinal microvascular network. J Biorheol 23:77‐86

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom