z-logo
Premium
Visual field screening by opticians with Damato Multifixation Campimetry Online ( DMCO )
Author(s) -
Olsen A.S.,
Damato B.,
Cour M.,
Kolko M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2015.0663
Subject(s) - false positive paradox , medicine , test (biology) , optometry , visual field , algorithm , glaucoma , sensitivity (control systems) , ophthalmology , artificial intelligence , computer science , engineering , paleontology , electronic engineering , biology
Purpose To study DMCO , a free of charge Internet‐based visual field test, used as a screening device in optician shops in Denmark. Methods Standard equipment was a computer, a wireless mouse and a 22” computer monitor. Optician shops in the region of Copenhagen were invited to participate. We used DMCO STANDARD 1 + 2, the best performing algorithm from our previous work, to screen. The algorithm demanded one or two successive DMCO tests with a cut‐off at 4 or 5 missed points on a DMCO test. This algorithm has performed with sensitivity of 64.2% and specificity of 98.1, respectively ( AUC  = 0.9). Results During 2014–2015 the DMCO STANDARD 1 + 2 algorithm has been evaluated in 12 optician shops. DMCO have been tested by 587 individuals of whom 31 demanded a full ophthalmology examination. The examinations revealed 7 glaucoma cases, 17 cases with different eye‐brain‐diseases, and 7 false positives. To date 46 individuals with a normal DMCO test have been examined: 44 healthy and 2 false negative cases. Preliminary results indicate DMCO to perform with sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 98.7%, respectively. Conclusions This study demonstrated that DMCO was able to find various visual field defects when used by opticians. The chosen algorithm maintained high specificity but a decline in sensitivity was noticed. There is scope for future improvements of DMCO and more studies are needed to confirm the findings.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here