z-logo
Premium
Lutein bioavailability is matrix‐dependent in powdered dietary supplements
Author(s) -
SCHALCH W,
BECK M,
ROOS F,
ELLIOTT J,
ROBERTS R
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.380.x
Subject(s) - bioavailability , lutein , zeaxanthin , cmax , absorption (acoustics) , area under the curve , food science , chemistry , medicine , carotenoid , pharmacology , materials science , composite material
Purpose Lutein (L) and zeaxanthin (Z) are the principal constituents of the macula lutea and have been associated with a reduction of risk for retinal diseases as well as improvements in visual function. Intake of L has also been reported to increase macular pigment levels, which are dependent on the bioavailability of the L source. External factors such as matrix composition and delivery system have a major impact on L absorption. A preliminary study in rats had indicated significant differences between the bioavailability of L formulated employing an alginate coating versus L embedded in a corn starch matrix. In order to evaluate these differences in humans, this comparative PK study was undertaken. Methods After a baseline period of 3 days, individual plasma responses to single doses of 20 mg unesterified L from product A or B were recorded in a randomized, double‐blind, two‐phase, cross‐over study enrolling 48 volunteers and conducted over 4 weeks for each cross‐over phase. Lutein plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC. Main PK parameters evaluated included the area under the curve, cmax, tmax, and elimination half‐time. Results A preliminary and blinded analysis showed striking differences, even though only the data of the first 7 out of the enrolled 48 subjects were available at the time of abstract submission. While the plasma level increase was minor with product A, product B almost doubled plasma concentrations on average (p<0.05). One of the seven subjects was a non‐responder to either product, but was still included in this initial analysis. Conclusion The drastic differences in apparent bioavailability between the two L forms emphasize the importance of matrix characteristics for the bioavailability of xanthophylls such as lutein.Commercial interest

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here