Premium
Diagnosis of adult ophthalmic tumours: role of clinical history, symptoms and signs
Author(s) -
KIVELÄ T
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.1251.x
Subject(s) - medicine , metamorphopsia , retinal detachment , ophthalmology , fundus (uterus) , ciliary body , serous fluid , macular degeneration , drusen , blurred vision , dermatology , visual acuity , retinal , pathology
Purpose To summarise signs and symptoms useful in diagnosing adult ophthalmic tumours. Methods Personal experience of the author as a member of the European Ophthalmic Oncology Group. Results According to studies from the United Kingdom, Finland and United States, 28‐42% of adult patients with intraocular tumours may experience delays because the lesion is either misdiagnosed (e.g. as macular degeneration, naevus, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment) or missed at the initial visit. Of these patients, 72‐87% have symptoms attributable to the tumour such as blurred vision, photopsia, floaters, metamorphopsia, and visual field loss. These symptoms can also be caused by many benign conditions (e.g. vitreous detachment) but should not be interpreted as innocent without thorough clinical examination. Signs specific for iris and ciliary body tumours include a tumour mass, sentinel vessels, acquired astigmatism, and cataracts. Choroidal tumours may induce serous retinal detachments, subretinal and vitreous bleedings and, sometimes, lipid exudation. Finally, orange subretinal pigment suggests the diagnosis of a uveal melanoma whereas many drusen point to a long‐standing naevus. Conclusion Signs and symptoms of ophthalmic tumours are mostly nonspecific, necessitating an appropriately high level of suspicion and a systematic approach to clinical examination to avoid delayed or missed diagnoses. Earlier diagnosis could be achieved especially if dilated fundus examinations were performed without exception and if all suspicious naevi were referred for a second opinion.