Premium
Face down posturing for macular hole surgery. Is it really required?
Author(s) -
TRANOS P
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.3415.x
Subject(s) - macular hole , vitrectomy , medicine , pars plana , internal limiting membrane , vitreoretinal surgery , gas bubble , cataract surgery , ophthalmology , surgery , optometry , visual acuity , bubble , parallel computing , computer science
Purpose Background: In macular hole surgery pars plana vitrectomy and intravitreal gas injection with or without inner limiting membrane peel, is considered the mainstay of treatment. The requirement for face down posturing is generally regarded as part of the traditional postoperative routine. Several mechanisms have been postulated to explain the action of the gas bubble including exertion of a large floatation force on the macula and prevention of the macular hole exposure to vitreous fluid. Recently the need to face down has been chalenged since this regime compromises patients’ postoperative quality of life and it makes macular hole surgery almost impossible for individuals with mental or physical limitations. Methods Review of personal data and systermatic literature review of studies investigating macular hole surgery with shortened or eliminated face down posturing. Results There is considerable body of evidence suggesting successful anatomical and functional outcome in patients with shorter duration of posturing or no posturing at all following macular hole surgery. The pros and cons of each technique will be presented in detail. Conclusion Prone posturing following macular hole surgery provides no functional or anatomic benefit but it is associated with slower progression of cataract. Combined phacovitrectomy without face down positioning may be considered for phakic patients undergoing macular hole surgery.