Premium
Subconjunctival bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization
Author(s) -
Zaki Ahmed A.,
Farid Samar F.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01585.x
Subject(s) - bevacizumab , medicine , corneal neovascularization , ophthalmology , neovascularization , choroidal neovascularization , cornea , surgery , chemotherapy , visual acuity , angiogenesis
Acta Ophthalmol. 2010: 88: 868–871 Abstract. Purpose: This work aimed to study and evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection in patients with corneal neovascularization (CNV) resulting from different ocular surface disorders. Methods: Ten eyes with CNV caused by different ocular surface disorders were studied. All eyes had both major and minor vessel CNV caused by factors such as healed corneal ulcers, long‐standing chronic inflammatory diseases and corneal ischaemia (caused by contact lenses). All eyes received a single subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg (0.1 ml) bevacizumab. Morphological changes in the major and minor vessels were evaluated using slit‐lamp biomicroscopy and corneal photography. Results: Conspicuous recession of the minor vessels of CNV was observed in all eyes at 2 weeks post‐injection. The extent of CNV of the major vessels was significantly decreased at 2 weeks post‐injection. The level of CNV continued to decrease noticeably for 3 months and then stabilized for the remainder of the 6‐month follow‐up period. Parameters used for evaluation included the total area of CNV, which amounted to 14.0 ± 5.4% of the corneal surface pre‐injection, compared with 9.4 ± 3.9% post‐injection (p < 0.01), reflecting a mean decrease in CNV of 33 ± 8%, and the extent of neovascularization, which decreased from 4.3 ± 1.5 clock hours pre‐injection to 2.4 ± 1.1 clock hours post‐injection (p < 0.01). During the 6‐month follow‐up, none of the 10 eyes showed any complication that could be related to subconjunctival bevacizumab injection. Conclusions: Bevacizumab can be used safely and effectively for CNV resulting from different ocular surface disorders. It represents an effective treatment for minor vessel neovascularization caused by long‐standing chronic inflammation (e.g. trachoma) or long‐standing corneal ischaemia (e.g. contact lenses), as well as for major vessel neovascularization resulting from different causes. Bevacizumab was well tolerated over the 6‐month follow‐up period.