z-logo
Premium
Capsule thickness of cataractous lenses with and without exfoliation syndrome
Author(s) -
Ruotsalainen Jaana,
Tarkkanen Ahti
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1987.tb07021.x
Subject(s) - exfoliation joint , lens capsule , capsule , medicine , ophthalmology , cataract surgery , equator , lens (geology) , anatomy , materials science , optics , glaucoma , biology , geology , graphene , botany , physics , geodesy , latitude , nanotechnology
Lens capsule thickness was measured in 105 cataractous lenses with and without exfoliation syndrome. The lenses were removed by intracapsular cryoextraction. Forty lenses (38%) showed exfoliation, while 65 (62%) were exfoliation negative. Thickness values were measured by light microscopy from the central anterior capsule, central posterior capsule and from the equator. The mean thickness values were for the central anterior capsule 8.2 ± 3.2 μ, for the central posterior capsule 3.2 ± 1.4 and for the equator 3.9 ± 1.3. There was no statistical difference between the exfoliation‐positive and exfoliation‐negative lenses. The capsule thickness varied greatly throughout the present material. The highest value, 22.4 μ, was measured from an exfoliation‐negative central anterior lens capsule of a male patient aged 33 years. The lowest value, 0.6 μ, was measured from an exfoliation‐positive central posterior capsule of a male patient aged 64 years. The central posterior capsule is the thinnest area of the lens capsule. The findings call for great caution in polishing the posterior capsule during extracapsular cataract surgery. The higher complication rate in eyes with exfoliation syndrome cannot be explained by thinner lens capsules but rather on the more friable zonules.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here