Premium
TYPICAL AND ATYPICAL MONOCHROMACY STUDIED BY SPECIFIC QUANTITATIVE PERIMETRY
Author(s) -
HANSEN EGILL
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1979.tb00485.x
Subject(s) - photophobia , cone (formal languages) , optics , wavelength , ophthalmology , color vision , colour vision , color vision defects , optometry , physics , medicine , mathematics , computer science , artificial intelligence , algorithm
Two blue cone monochromats and four rod monochromats have been studied by increment threshold measurements applying the Stiles' principle. Some rudimentary colour discrimination was reported by the blue cone monochromats. One patient showed good discrimination between short‐ and middle‐wavelength lights in matching experiments using the Nagel II apparatus. His neutral band in the spectrum was at ΛΛ = 485–495 nm. Dichromatic vision could not be proved in the other patient. The blue cone monochromats also had good responding blue mechanism in the periphery. Indication of cone activity other than blue cones is found in both kinds of monochromats; these cones being probably of the rhodopsin‐cone type (π 0 cones). The conclusions are drawn that the inhibitory effect of the π 0 cones upon the rod mechanism may account for the differences shown by our two blue cone monochromats as to visual acuity, nystagmus and photophobia. Likewise, their differences regarding dichromatic vision may be explained by an unequal number of π 0 cones in their retinas rather than by differences in their blue mechanisms.