z-logo
Premium
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
Author(s) -
Aparna Ananthakrishnan,
Fiona Samuels,
Rachel Marcus,
Carmen Leon-Himmelstine
Publication year - 1978
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1978.tb06143.x
Subject(s) - citation , computer science , information retrieval , library science
In the statistics for occupational injuries, eye injuries account for 3-5 % (Tugman 1955, Mattos 1958, Lindstedt 1966), when minor traumas are disregarded. In Finland before 1936 eye injuries made up about 11 % of all occupational injuries, but since then, including the years 1950-59, the proportion has been between 3.1 and 3.7 % (Table I). From the beginning of 1936 the statistics refer only to accidents in which the rate of compensation exceeded 200 Fmk (= 146 Fmk at the level of July 1977) (Official Statistics of Finland). Although eye injuries accounted for only 3.1-3.7 % of all occupational injuries, they accounted for 27 % of all disablement cases during the thirties and for 11 % during the fifties. In the different clinics of Europe the proportion of PEIs among all eye injuries varies widely, averaging 36.8 % for adults and 42.2 % for children. The proportion of PEIs among all in-patients of eye hospitals averages 5.3 % (Werner 1933 and 1952, Lambah 1962, Oksala 1964, Holland 1964, Muller-Jensen 1964, Wollensak & Hornung 1965, Kobor 1965, Sollner 1966, KovaEik 1967, Remky et al. 1967, Muller 1968). The proportion of occupational injuries among PEIs averages about 43 % (RoperHall 1959, Kleinhans 1961, Ragnetti & Massimeo 1965, Pietruschka & Paul 1966, Waubke et al. 1968, Pockrand et al. 1974). For the more industrialized regions the figures are higher than for the agricultural regions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here