z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An investigation using the choice experiment method into options for reducing illegal bushmeat hunting in western Serengeti
Author(s) -
Moro Mirko,
Fischer Anke,
Czajkowski Mikołaj,
Brennan Dervla,
Lowassa Asanterabi,
Naiman Loiruck C.,
Hanley Nick
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
conservation letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.153
H-Index - 79
ISSN - 1755-263X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00284.x
Subject(s) - bushmeat , livelihood , business , market access , natural resource economics , psychological intervention , socioeconomics , development economics , geography , economics , ecology , wildlife , archaeology , biology , agriculture , psychology , psychiatry
Bushmeat hunting is perceived as a serious threat to the conservation status of many species in Africa. We use a novel livelihood choice experiment method to investigate the role of illegal hunting within livelihood strategies in the western Serengeti, and to identify potential trade‐offs between illegal hunting and other income sources. We find that increasing access to microcredit, higher wages, increases in number of cows, weeks hunting and increased access to market all contribute to well‐being. We are able to quantify the trade‐offs between weeks spent illegal hunting and increases in cattle, wage income, access to markets, and access to microcredit. However, important differences emerge in response to these variables between different wealth groups which shape how we should design conservation and development interventions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here