Open AccessDoes Indonesia's REDD+ moratorium on new concessions spare imminently threatened forests?
Author(s) -
Sloan Sean,
Edwards David P.,
Laurance William F.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
conservation letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.153
H-Index - 79
ISSN - 1755-263X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00233.x
Subject(s) - deforestation (computer science) , peat , agroforestry , threatened species , logging , high forest , environmental science , environmental protection , geography , ecology , forestry , habitat , archaeology , computer science , biology , programming language
In May 2010, Indonesia signed a $1‐billion partnership with Norway to reduce deforestation and prepare for a global REDD+ scheme (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation). A pillar of the pact is a moratorium on new agricultural and logging licenses in ∼535,294 km 2 of species‐rich dryland forest and ∼153,984 km 2 of carbon‐rich peatlands. A critical question is whether these moratorium areas constitute "additional" conservation. We test whether dryland forests and peatlands within moratorium areas differ from unprotected forest and recently cleared forest on a range of biophysical, economic, and agricultural attributes indicative of forest threat. Compared to other forests, dryland moratorium forests are significantly more marginal economically, less physically accessible, more removed from forest disruption, and more sheltered from encroachment, such that their "conservation" achieves little additional prevention of forest loss and carbon emissions. Peatland moratorium areas are, however, a conservation success insofar as they are indistinguishable from unprotected peatland and encompass the majority of remaining peatland area, much of which is vulnerable to future conversion.