z-logo
Premium
William Heytesbury and the Conditions for Knowledge
Author(s) -
MARTENS DAVID B.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
theoria
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.34
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 1755-2567
pISSN - 0040-5825
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-2567.2010.01082.x
Subject(s) - demise , continuance , religious belief , philosophy , epistemology , law , political science
Ivan Boh affirms and Robert Pasnau denies that William Heytesbury holds merely true belief to be sufficient for knowledge in the broad sense. I argue that Boh is correct and Pasnau is mistaken, and that there is a long‐running orthodox medieval tradition agreeing with Heytesbury about the conditions for knowledge. I offer a hypothesis about the origins, continuance and demise of that medieval tradition, and some remarks about the tradition's significance.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here