Premium
Repetitive sequences in phylogeographic inference: a reply to Saltonstall and Lambertini (2012)
Author(s) -
FREELAND JOANNA,
VACHON NICOLE
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
molecular ecology resources
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.96
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1755-0998
pISSN - 1755-098X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03145.x
Subject(s) - biology , phylogeography , inference , evolutionary biology , mutation , genetics , computational biology , phylogenetics , artificial intelligence , gene , computer science
In 2011, Vachon and Freeland presented the results of a study that illustrated the importance of considering mutation patterns, including the potential for homoplasy, when deciding whether to include or exclude repetitive sequences from phylogeographic inferences. Saltonstall and Lambertini (2012) criticized this study by suggesting that some of the analyses and interpretations were flawed. In this reply, we explain why we disagree with most of their criticisms and identify some inconsistencies in their analyses. Most importantly, we reiterate the need to examine underlying assumptions, particularly with respect to mutation patterns, when using molecular genetic data to untangle evolutionary relationships.