Premium
The Pricing of Risk and Sentiment: A Study of Executive Stock Options
Author(s) -
Chang Charles,
Chen Lijiun,
Fuh Chengder
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
financial management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.647
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1755-053X
pISSN - 0046-3892
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-053x.2012.01216.x
Subject(s) - stock options , executive compensation , overconfidence effect , economics , stock (firearms) , financial economics , value (mathematics) , non qualified stock option , black–scholes model , actuarial science , valuation of options , market sentiment , business , restricted stock , finance , stock market , psychology , computer science , volatility (finance) , mechanical engineering , social psychology , corporate governance , machine learning , engineering , paleontology , horse , biology
Option pricing models accounting for illiquidity generally imply the options are valued at a discount to the Black‐Scholes value. Our model considers the role of sentiment, which offsets illiquidity. Using executive stock options and compensation data from 1992 to 2004 for S&P 1500 firms, we find that executives value employee stock options (ESOs) at a 48% premium to the Black‐Scholes value. These premia are explained by a sentiment level of 12% in risk‐adjusted, annualized return, suggesting a high level of executive overconfidence. Subjective value relates negatively to illiquidity and idiosyncratic risk, and positively to sentiment in all specifications, consistent with the offsetting roles of sentiment and risk aversion.