Premium
Are Good Performers Bad Acquirers?
Author(s) -
Baker H. Kent,
Dutta Shantanu,
Saadi Samir,
Zhu PengCheng
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
financial management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.647
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1755-053X
pISSN - 0046-3892
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-053x.2012.01179.x
Subject(s) - insider , overconfidence effect , business , chief executive officer , perception , earnings , monetary economics , accounting , management , economics , psychology , social psychology , law , neuroscience , political science
We examine how the market reacts to announcements of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) by well‐performing acquirers and evaluate the results in light of three hypotheses: 1) managerial ability, 2) empire building, and 3) chief executive officer (CEO) overconfidence. Our results indicate that an empire‐building motive drives the relationship between past superior operating performance and M&A announcements. Long‐term operating performance drops significantly for acquiring firms with past superior operating performance. Our evidence also indicates that the presence of insider directors helps to alleviate the negative perception of acquisitions made by firms with better operating performance or empire‐building CEOs.