Premium
Soil nitrogen utilisation for growth and gas exchange by grapevines in response to nitrogen supply and rootstock
Author(s) -
KELLER MARKUS,
KUMMER MARKUS,
VASCONCELOS M. CARMO
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
australian journal of grape and wine research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1755-0238
pISSN - 1322-7130
DOI - 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2001.tb00187.x
Subject(s) - rootstock , xylem , nitrogen , transpiration , photosynthesis , chemistry , stomatal conductance , chlorophyll , agronomy , shoot , horticulture , botany , biology , organic chemistry
This study investigated the response to nitrogen (0 or 100 kg N/ha) of field‐grown Müller‐Thurgau grapevines grafted on six rootstocks (Kober 5BB, Teleki 5C, Teleki 8B, Selection Oppenheim 4, Couderc 3309, Ruggeri 140). Half the nitrogen was applied four weeks pre‐flowering and half at the end of flowering. Glutamine accounted for over 85% of xylem nitrogen, indicating that most soil nitrogen was assimilated by way of vine root metabolism. Nitrogen supply increased the translocation of glutamine, glutamate, NO 3 ‐ ‐ , NH 4 +, K+, Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ and PO 4 3– in the xylem sap and decreased the ratio of organic to inorganic nitrogen. V. berlandieri × V. riparia crosses generally resulted in higher xylem solute concentrations compared with other rootstocks, but were less effective in total nitrogen assimilation. High soil nitrogen increased vine leaf area by stimulating lateral‐shoot growth, increased leaf chlorophyll, photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance, and delayed leaf senescence. There was no difference among rootstocks in scion leaf area, but rootstocks affected scion response to soil nitrogen level in terms of leaf chlorophyll content and leaf gas exchange; SO4 induced the strongest reaction to soil N, whereas Ru‐140 elicited the least reaction. Chlorophyll content was highest for vines grafted on 5BB and lowest for C‐3309. Photosynthesis response to both nitrogen and rootstock was regulated at the mesophyll level. There were few interactions between nitrogen and rootstocks, and their contribution to total variance was small relative to main effects. Thus, with the exception of SO4, differences due to rootstocks were mostly unaffected by soil nitrogen level.