Premium
The dosimetric consequences of anatomic changes in head and neck radiotherapy patients
Author(s) -
Height Rebecca,
Khoo Vincent,
Lawford Catherine,
Cox Jennifer,
Joon Daryl Lim,
Rolfo Aldo,
Wada Morikatsu
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.31
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1754-9485
pISSN - 1754-9477
DOI - 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02209.x
Subject(s) - medicine , radiation therapy , nuclear medicine , dosimetry , head and neck cancer , radiation treatment planning , lymph node , dosing , head and neck , radiology , surgery
To investigate anatomical response‐related changes in the head and neck region during a course of radical radiotherapy and their impact on the planned dosimetry. Methods: The study consisted of 10 patients with primary mucosal carcinoma. Patients' nutritional requirements were managed as per departmental protocol to minimise weight loss during treatment. Kilovoltage computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired once 40 to 50 Gy had been delivered. Gross tumour volumes (GTV) and organs at risk were delineated and the initial optimised treatment plan was overlaid on the repeat CT. Comparisons were made between scans and absolute volume variations, centres of structures, dice similarity coefficients and the subsequent dosimetric impact were assessed. Results: Median weight loss at second scan was 3%. Primary and lymph node GTVs reduced by 49.9% (range 21.3–82%) and 73.7% (range 61.7–88.6%), respectively, yet continued to receive the prescribed dose. Maximum dose to spinal cord and brainstem changed minimally. Spared and un‐spared parotid gland volumes reduced by median 23.5% and 20.5%, respectively, with no consistent translational displacement direction and minimal change in the mean dose. Conclusions: Despite some significant geometric changes, nutritional management ensured patient size and shape was maintained in these consecutively selected patients and subsequently there was no apparent under‐dosing of targets or over‐dosing of normal structures with this technique. Further investigations which model gradual change and allow cumulative dosimetry are required to better characterise what occurs during the treatment course.