Premium
Institutions, Identity and Unity: The Anomaly of Australian Nationalism *
Author(s) -
Parent Joseph M.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
studies in ethnicity and nationalism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.204
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 1754-9469
pISSN - 1473-8481
DOI - 10.1111/j.1754-9469.2007.tb00116.x
Subject(s) - appeal , elite , argument (complex analysis) , nationalism , autonomy , identity (music) , independence (probability theory) , political economy , political science , settlement (finance) , incentive , sociology , law , politics , economics , biochemistry , chemistry , statistics , mathematics , finance , payment , microeconomics , physics , acoustics
Why has Australia not produced a viable separatist movement? This non‐event is all the more striking compared to the separatism experienced by the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada, among others. Individually or combined, the major paradigms cannot explain separatism or its absence. This paper advances an elite persuasion argument and contends that success of separatist movements depends on the conditions in which elites appeal for autonomy. Specifically, five conditions are necessary for a viable separatist movement: 1) cultural differences, 2) economic incentives, 3) security, 4) concentrated minority settlement patterns, and 5) favourable domestic institutions. The analysis focuses on a comparison between Australia and Canada, but has implications for other separatist and potentially separatist areas.